Lost Password?
Trent Reznor: Singlehandedly Fixing the Music Industry?
3
Written by Dan Strobel  NC State 
Sunday, 23 March 2008

ImageWill new marketing techniques, a la Radiohead's In Rainbows, be able to fix the music industry? Trent Reznor is the latest example that they certainly have a chance.

Earlier this year, Radiohead released their album In Rainbows as a digital download for whatever price one wished to pay for it. Radiohead was lauded as the first to take the steps toward redefining the broken record industry.

However, Radiohead’s manager has also made it known that they probably won’t try a similar marketing strategy again.  Trent Reznor, of Nine Inch Nails fame, has decided to take things one step further.

In an interview with the Australia Broadcasting Corporation, Reznor was quoted as saying, “I think the way [Radiohead] parlayed it into a marketing gimmick has certainly been shrewd…if you look at what they did, it was very much a bait and switch, to get you to pay for a Myspace quality stream as a way to promote a traditional record sale.” 

It sounds as if Mr. Reznor is not as starry-eyed as seemingly everyone else about Radiohead’s against the grain tactics. 

He was further quoted as saying, “…to me that feels insincere.  It relies upon the fact that it was quote-unquote ‘first,’ and it takes the headlines with it.” 

As a man with well-known and verifiable beef with the record industry, it seems as if Reznor has taken it upon himself to change things.

Reznor is following up his previous viral marketing strategies for Year Zero -- clues hidden in tour merchandise that led fans to fake web sites detailing a post-apocalyptic and desolate United States in the year 2022 and unheard songs on USB drives hidden in NIN concert venues across Europe -- with more tricks that show the depth of his understanding for the future of music.

On March 2, he released Ghosts I-IV, a 36-track instrumental album via the Nine Inch Nail’s web site.  The record is available in a variety of ways, either as a free download of the first nine tracks, a $5 download of all 36 tracks, a $10 two CD set, a $75 deluxe edition package and a $300 ultra-deluxe limited edition package which featured a Reznor autograph, along with a variety of other merchandise. The limited edition package has already sold out all 2,500 copies.             

It might also be noted that all of the Ghosts downloads came with wallpapers, a 40-page PDF of abstract pictures to go with the albums, and other multimedia. The track are high-quality DRM-free MP3s compressed at 320 kbps. In Rainbows came with nothing other than the tunes and as 160 kbps DRM-free MP3s. 

Like any other destitute college student, I downloaded the first nine tracks for free and gave them a listen. Described by Reznor as “music for daydreams,” it sounds a lot like Year Zero slowed way, way down and without voices; it won’t hold your attention for long, but it's good background noise for a pensive acid trip.     

In a little over a week, Reznor reported that he made over $1.6 million from Ghosts. 

While critics have argued over schematics and implementationof Radiohead’s and Reznor’s nascent business models on a mass scale, it is nice to see someone as skilled as the Nine Inch Nail’s frontman trying something new.  The record industry here and overseas has been floundering recently and in need of rescue. The question is, will they be able to learn from Reznor’s success?

Hits: 12807
feed8 Comments
One Salient Oversight
Mar 23, 08

Votes: +0

Although the NIN website only made the first 9 tracks of the album free to download, all 36 songs are licensed under a Creative Commons License which means that Reznor has made the entire album free to copy, download, distribute and modify.

If you wish to download the entire album in CD quality, simply go into google and type "Ghosts flac" and you can download the entire album (via Bittorrent) in .flac format.

Although much filesharing is technically "illegal", downloading the NIN album in such a way is NOT illegal in any way or form.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
so
Mar 23, 08

Votes: +0

Or you could not be an asshole and pay the fucking 5 bucks for the album (and this is a 36 track album, not the usual 14 tracks or so for 30$)

report abuse
vote down
vote up
DebtOn
Mar 24, 08

Votes: +0

I think the biggest selling point on the deluxe edition is that he included the digital files he used to make the music, with all the individual instrument tracks. To a homemade remix artist, this is a gold mine.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Adam H
Mar 24, 08

Votes: +0

If it's released under CC, then the author intended for people to be able to get it for free. Taking them up on it isn't being an asshole. Maybe they won't like it, why should they pay 5 bucks for it? Obviously plenty of folks did feel it was worth paying for, and reportedly the artist made a fairly substantial windfall. What's to be upset about?

report abuse
vote down
vote up
F
Mar 24, 08

Votes: +0

Whether or not to pay for Ghosts if you indeed do listen to it regularly, is more of a ethical and moral issue than a legal issue. The decent thing to do if you listen to and enjoy his record, is to buy it. Most of us can afford the 5 bucks. Most of us can afford to pay even more than 5 bucks -- especially when the value delivered is higher than for a traditional CD.

Having a "taste" should be free: you listen to it, and if you don't like it, you don't buy it. Simple as that. If you do like it you can choose to support the band to ensure they can make a living creating what you enjoy listening to.

Now, the creative commons license, in my opinion, serves a slightly different purpose. I view it as removing the usual obstacles of creating derivative works. To create a derivative work of some piece of music is fraught with legal risks and substantial cost: if you sample a piece of music and use it in your own work, you need to license it. Even if you do not intend to charge money for your derivative work. These fees tend to be exorbitant.

What Trent Reznor has done is to make it a lot simpler for fans to create derivative works that can be distributed under certain conditions WITHOUT the risk of being slapped with a lawsuit that can bankrupt you.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Jason
Mar 25, 08

Votes: +0

I fully support the rebranding of a high bitrate DRM free Mp3 Albums at $5, I'd probably buy more instead of the nothing I buy now because CDs are way overpriced.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
JC
Mar 26, 08

Votes: +0

come on - if people don't think all the work Trent put into this project, along with Atticus, Allesandro and Rob - the 3 main people other than Trent involved - isn't worth $5 - what is to become of music. I personally find the low price tag kind of insulting to the level of genious and work that was put into this project. Just because Trent's rich doesn't mean he doesn't deserve to be compensated for his work - and Rob, Atticus and Allesandro sure aren't rich. You can't even buy a beer in a club for $5, and there are people who are unwilling to pay $5 for 36 full songs.

I don't think he licensed it under cc so cheap assholes can avoid paying $5 - it's so some 14 year old can make a remix or do a youtube video and not have to worry about the music industry making an example of them and sueing their 14 year old ass. What Trent's doing makes me love and respect him even more

report abuse
vote down
vote up
japanfunny
Mar 29, 08

Votes: +0

FTP File downloads Good
Trent Reznor
Http://file.noocle.com

report abuse
vote down
vote up

Write comment
 
 
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smaller | bigger
 

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
< Prev   Next >